Sunday 17 February 2013

Vulnerability and Threat: Sickert verses Ensor


I wonder how often Walter Richard Sickert and James Ensor have been considered alongside each other; true they are not so far apart in terms of history (they were both born in 1860 and lived until the late 1940s), and true Sickert spent some time in France in the 1900s before returning home to produce the controversial works of contemporary London, but it was not until I stumbled across Ensor’s La Dame en détresse (1882) in the Musee D’Orsay that I recognised a potential for visual comparison between the production of the two artists.

At face value this is to be found in similarities of subject: La Dame en Détresse portrays a woman collapsed on a bed, with curtains closed and details of her person masked by the manner of painting. This subject immediately conjures the association of Sickert’s Camden Town series, a set of works which give account of a very particular incident.


Walter Richard Sickert was a British artist trained by James McNeill Whistler, who had encouraged him to travel to Paris. Whilst there he became fascinated with the force of Modernism, as exemplified in the work of Edouard Manet and the biting realism of Edgar Degas. Returning home to London in 1905 Sickert found it a centre for a similar cultural Modernity to that which he had encountered in Paris, and to which the French artists were so brilliantly responding. In line with Charles Baudelaire’s The Heroes of the Basement Sickert lived a working class life in Camden Town, and he chose the working class people over the bourgeois as his subjects. However, this decision was not quite as refreshing as one might first think; what Sickert delighted in was the vulgarity of this life; he does not paint ordinary life in order to dignify or monumentalise it, he is simply fascinated by the grim details of the ordinary existence.

This vulgarity reaches their extremes in the Camden Town Murder paintings. The brutal murder of a young woman called Emily Dimmock – who sometimes made ends meet through prostitution – shook the general public and became a piece of fascination for the popular press. The memory of Jack the Ripper’s savage crimes were still present in people’s consciousness, and in no-one’s more than Sickert who had always been obsessed with these murders. Dimmock became a kind of perverse muse for him. He rented the rooms in which she had been killed, and even hired the defendant in the case after he had been acquitted to pose as a model for his paintings. These paintings are comparable to CSI: each item in the room is placed there for some reason. In each work he reconstructs the murder scene placing a different emphasis or interpretation on the event; his muse takes on the role of victim or whore.

Taking Camden Town Affair (1909) as an example, Sickert turns a work which initially seems to present a nude asleep into something more aggressive by the confrontational placing of the viewer within the scene. We stand at the end of her bed, viewing the women in a way which not only distorts the appearance of the body through the foreshortening, but also accents her sexualised areas. Sickert helps this along by highlighting these areas with touches of lightness. The nudity of this woman is not remotely desirable or erotic, rather her naked state emphasises her vulnerability. The shadowy figure of a man fully clothed by her bedside accents this vulnerability whilst also placing us as the viewer in an uncomfortable position; why are we privy to this scene? And is it possible that we are the ones who threaten the vulnerable woman?

Walter Sickert, Camden Town Affair, 1909

Of course to the informed viewer this woman is not sleeping. The distortion of the woman’s limbs give this away; her positioning is not one which anyone would naturally lie, whether awake or asleep. This arrangement testifies to the struggle of defence which concluded with her loss of life. This struggle is communicated in the painting of the room. While in one way the scene radiates silence, the surroundings – the bed, the floor, the walls – scream out the drama which they have witnessed. Sickert’s brushwork on the sheets of the bed is erratic and disturbing; the floor colour is clearly painted over black as if trying to cover over the horrific secret.

This was an unsolved murder trial, only the physical setting of the room could testify to the identity of the murderer.


As the title suggests, Ensor’s subject is not a corpse. Though her form is limp and passive, we are told that she is ‘A Woman in Distress’. Rather than testifying to a physical crime, this scene seeks to present an internal turmoil.

James Ensor, La Dame en détresse, 1882

While Sickert played upon the obsession with crimes of the popular press, Ensor chose to present Modernity is quite a different way. As an artist he is well known for his masked caricatures of crowded groups. There were various theories which were popularised in the second half of the 19th century concerning the impact of the urban environment on Mental Wealth; these included Georg Simmel’s The Metropolis and Mental Life (1902-3) as well as the theories of behaviour within crowds by Gustave Le Bon and Sigmund Freud. Ensor plays upon these theories in his art. In Self Portrait with Masks (1899) he relays the loneliness and claustrophobia of the individual within the city crowds by filling the space with dehumanised forms of people; the extremism of these beings suffocates the realism of the artist’s own portrait in the centre of the work.

 
James Ensor, Self-Portrait with Masks, 1899

All this made it surprising to find a work so seemingly ‘conservative’ as this one. However, as with Sickert’s work, it is the subtleties of the painting which when revealed make it so disturbing. A close inspection of the iconography reveals ghoulish faces hidden across the painting: in the bed-knobs, the curtain ties, the carvings of the bed. These mystical clues indicate how we should read the interior scene we see.

Several Symbolist artists were interested in the representation of urban anxieties through the analogy of the interior of a room and the interior of a mind. Vilhelm Hammershoi is one such example of this; his empty interiors often include a single figure with her face obscured, and all the routes of escape from the space are blocked. In Woman Reading the lines of perspective of the object in the room are exaggerated to a vanishing point by the woman’s head, thereby directly referencing her psychological character, and the door is closed in on us so the only space we are aware of is the one room. The suggestion is that this woman in some way feels trapped within her mind, isolated from the world by her invisibility within the urban environment.

Vilhelm Hammershoi, Woman Reading, 1908

It is likely that this is just what Ensor looks to achieve in La Dame en détresse. We notice that the curtains are closed upon her, and where they are open we are not permitted any view of the world beyond. The title claims that this woman is in ‘distress’ but the woman herself is passive and still – the active angst of the work is to be found in the enclosure of the darkened bedroom. The figure of the woman herself is almost formless: her body has collapsed completely into the bed so, were it not for the colour of her clothing, we might not be able to distinguish her form. The subject is not aware of her physical self within the Modern city: the contemporary fashion which she wears which might bring her a sense of belonging is dematerialised and instead we see only the internal feelings of being haunted by urban anxieties which threaten that sense of belonging.


The comparison of these works reveals a commentary on the modern woman in the urban environment at the turn of the century, but the most interesting aspect of both these works is both artist’s choice to present the woman within the private space of her bedroom. It is here that the woman is most vulnerable, either through her physical or emotional exposure; the viewer is permitted an intimacy with the subject in both scenes which is distinctly unnerving. In this way, both Ensor and Sickert prove themselves to be truly Modernist.

No comments:

Post a Comment